notes on museum decolonization and its true, more complex outcomes
The mere dichotomy between these two (of many) opinions showcases just how complicated one decolonial effort can be. Dahomey captures this effectively by incorporating long scenes of pure discussion. We see the faces that speak these ideas, the hands that created these objects, and the objects' spirits and how they impact the their diverse audiences. Although the film captures the “superficial” and immediate effects of one case of repatriation, it makes us think about the long-lasting effects of how museums try to decolonize. To me, the film says, if these are the conversations sprouting from repatriation at this moment, to what extent will they be in the next ten, fifty, or one hundred years? What is the future of museums, and how do we decolonize them properly and sensitively?